We have always faced the problems of development of our territory as a "problem mountain." Maybe we should change the terms, and then the prospect, and to start talking about the "Problem flesh."
When referring to the mountain looks like a problem you want to say that the mountain is a problem as such: mountain synonymous with underdevelopment. Yet we all know that there are mountains far from being characterized by under-development. Still, the mountain itself is not a problem but rather a feature that should be considered in the resolution of the problem and could become an added value.
At the time of the referendum supporters emphasized the need of the new province would be the advantage derived from a new institute to direct democracy. He blamed the lack of development in the absence of direct democracy.
Mountain and democracy have always been so used as an excuse for not addressing the problem of why the meat is still a region lagging in development. Yet it is an area of \u200b\u200bVenice-Monaco lapped from the highway and then not insignificant but quite the center of the European system. A territory with a discrete internal roads, a heritage building renovated after the earthquake. An area that, according to all the visitors, had the nature and history distinctive features exceptional tourism potential under-utilized. An area with high human resource education, etc.. etc..
But these strengths have not been sufficient to create the conditions for an appropriate economic development and social, that makes the area a land of choice rather than emigration.
Why? There must be an element of weakness, a critical asset that neutralizes the positive! Sure! But the paradox, in my view, is that this in itself constitutes a competitive advantage. This identity, Carnian, Carnian of feeling. A feeling that, by joining, should be a strong point. Instead is a strength when opposed to others, becomes an element of weakness when we experience it ourselves. What becomes positively carnico pride and encourages us in comparison with others, when we are one of us becomes empty pride, envy in the negative, the desire to demolish instead of building. The extra element becomes a problem, as sometimes happens in a football team for which the advantage of having a champion, leads to the loss of a team that does not turn.
What to do? Meanwhile, it is important that we share the diagnosis. Continuing to say that the problem is the mountain or institutions, only lose time imagining prognosis unnecessary. But if we convince ourselves that the problem is cultural, it would be easier to agree on a new project for a new path of rebirth. We finally figured out where to start! ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment